DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES

Division of Public Health

Statutory Authority: 16 Delaware Code,

Chapter 26A, Section 2631 (16 Del.C. §2631)

FINAL

ORDER

4108 Hearing Aid Loan Bank Program

Nature Of The Proceedings:

Findings Of Fact:

Summary Of Evidence

Section 3.1.4: This section requires a parent with private insurance to obtain an actual denial letter. This requirement could cause an unnecessary delay and is overly restrictive considering a parent could produce a benefits package description excluding hearing aid coverage, which should be acceptable. Additionally, an audiologist may have sought preauthorization which was rejected by phone without issuance of a formal letter. It is recommended that the requirement to produce a denial letter be deleted from this section. By deleting this phrase, this section will also be co-terminus with Section 3.3.1.

Section 3.2.4: This section requires the donee to, “be responsible for any damage to or loss of the hearing aid”. As the parent of a child with an orthodontic retainer will attest, kids can be expected to misplace or lose valuable items. To expect a 1-2 year old toddler to display adult prudence and care of a hearing aid defies reality. The section essentially makes the donee an “insurer” of the device, responsible for damage or loss regardless of the exercise of care by the parent/donee. Since only parents without the ability to pay for a hearing aid are eligible for the program, it is doubtful that the parent or guardian will have the ability to repay for a lost or damaged hearing aid. Recommend this provision either be deleted or amended to read, “ . . . be responsible for any damage to or loss of the hearing aid, apart from normal wear and tear, due to the intentional or gross negligence of the parent or guardian . . .”.

Section 3.3.3: This section of the Regulation creates an additional “hurdle” for a parent seeking an extension of the 6 month initial loan by requiring “proof of making reasonable efforts to obtain immediate access to another hearing aid, such as pursuing insurance coverage for hearing aids or pursuing alternate financial assistance to cover the hearing aid.” If a parent does not have Medicaid, CHIP, or private insurance coverage and is poor, that should suffice. The State should not require the parent to prove exhaustion of charitable institutions (Church; Lion’s Club; Delaware PVA; Needy Family Fund) or bank loans. Recommend deletion of this provision.

The age of eligibility needs to be clarified. Some regulations contemplate eligibility for children “under the age of (3) years”[Section 2.0 “Eligible Child” Definition; Section 3.1]. We read this as meaning up to the child’s third birthday, i.e., “under” age 3. However, Section 3.3.4 permits up to 2 extensions “during the third year of life” suggesting potential loan periods up to the fourth birthday. If that is the intent, it is recommended that the Agency amend the definition of “Eligible Child” in Section 2.0 to read:

Section 4.0: What is the purpose of including this section in these Regulations? If this is a supplement to Section 3.2.4, a parent whose child lost a hearing aid would ostensibly be compelled to both pay for the hearing aid and pay a fine of up to $1,000.00. In combination, this certainly has an “in terrorem” effect which should deter any logical person from using this program.

Section 3.2.4: Rather than making the parent or guardian responsible for damage or loss of the hearing aid (total cost), recommend the Division of Public Health carry additional loss and damage insurance on the hearing aid and make the parent or guardian responsible for the deductible for that insurance. The deductible would be less costly and more reasonable than making the parent or guardian responsible for the cost of the hearing aid.

108 Hearing Aid Loan Bank Program Regulations

1.0 Purpose

2.0 Definitions

3.0 Eligibility

4.0 Penalty for Non-Compliance

7 DE Reg. 1758 (06/01/04) (Final)